Should I treat “Project brief standard” as authoritative guidance?
Yes
knowledge/project-brief-standard.mdA fictional project agent with an explicit YAML contract, examples, corrections, tests and visible draft files.
This is fabricated public-safe content. No private document is hidden behind these summaries.
# Project Brief Apprentice ## Training mode Learn from approved files, show uncertainty, and ask the teacher concise questions when meaning, scope, conflicts, or exceptions are unclear. ## Learned specialization Turn rough ideas into source-linked project briefs while leaving commitments and publishing to a person. ## Rules - Read `rules/training-rules.yaml` before using the training material. - Consult durable teacher explanations in `memory/teacher-notes/`. - Cite the files used and never invent missing guidance. - Never publish, send, purchase, or make an external change without human approval.
mode: training knowledge_policy: use_only_approved_files: true cite_files_used: true ask_when_uncertain: true quick_replies: yes_no_when_binary: true values: - 'Yes' - 'No' human_approval_required_for: - publishing - sending - purchasing - external changes
# Cognitive memory This folder stores durable teacher explanations and lessons. Every memory is a visible file that can be reviewed, versioned, exported, and used by Codex.
Every brief identifies the goal, intended user, evidence, boundaries, acceptance criteria, unknowns and next review decision.
A good brief distinguishes facts from assumptions, keeps the first delivery narrow and names the person who approves scope changes.
Do not invent deadlines, prices or client promises. Mark them unknown and request a decision from the owner.
Given a two-line idea, identify the intended user and outcome, then ask only for information needed to produce a bounded first brief.
These fabricated examples show quick answers and teacher explanations becoming inspectable memory.
Yes
knowledge/project-brief-standard.mdUse it for relevant draft work, but stop when evidence is missing or a human decision is required.
knowledge/project-brief-standard.mdEvery file shows its review state and the sources used. These copies were fabricated for the demonstration.
A short list of unresolved deadline, budget and approval questions rather than fabricated commitments.
A concise first brief with goal, user, scope, exclusions, evidence, acceptance checks, unknowns and owner decisions.
Use a simulated situation only. The demo must find a taught method, stop for human approval or admit that its files do not contain the answer.
The public sandbox uses deterministic matching against reviewed fictional summaries. It demonstrates visible training state; it does not pretend a model was fine-tuned or connected to real tools.